Of course, this stems mostly from my disagreement that abortion is emphatically not the only issue that really matters, as insinuated by the following statement:
Less than two weeks ago, Archbishop Raymond L. Burke of St. Louis issued just such a statement. Bishop Michael J. Sheridan of Colorado Springs and Archbishop John J. Myers of Newark have both recently declared that the obligation to oppose abortion outweighs any other issue.
In theological terms, these bishops and the voter guides argue that abortion and the destruction of embryos are categorically wrong under church doctrine. War and even the death penalty can in certain circumstances be justified.
Indeed:
But it is impossible to know how many bishops share this view, and there is resistance from a sizable wing of the church that argues that voting solely on abortion slights Catholic teaching on a range of other issues, including war, poverty, the environment and immigration.
Frankly, Kerry’s eloquent response to the abortion question asked by a fetching blond with big puppy-dog eyes (who struck me as possibly being a not-so-undecided voter somehow planted by the right - which isn’t to say her question isn’t valid, just that the last few pictures from this somewhat disturbing “fan site” would add to the conspiracy theory) in the second debate sums up the very reason why I would contend this guy is wrong:
First of all, I cannot tell you how deeply I respect the belief about life and when it begins. I’m a Catholic, raised a Catholic. I was an altar boy. Religion has been a huge part of my life. It helped lead me through a war, leads me today.
But I can’t take what is an article of faith for me and legislate it for someone who doesn’t share that article of faith, whether they be agnostic, atheist, Jew, Protestant, whatever. I can’t do that.
But I can counsel people. I can talk reasonably about life and about responsibility. I can talk to people, as my wife Teresa does, about making other choices, and about abstinence, and about all these other things that we ought to do as a responsible society.
But as a president, I have to represent all the people in the nation. And I have to make that judgment.
Now, I believe that you can take that position and not be pro- abortion, but you have to afford people their constitutional rights. And that means being smart about allowing people to be fully educated, to know what their options are in life, and making certain that you don’t deny a poor person the right to be able to have whatever the constitution affords them if they can’t afford it otherwise.
That’s why I think it’s important. That’s why I think it’s important for the United States, for instance, not to have this rigid ideological restriction on helping families around the world to be able to make a smart decision about family planning.Â
You’ll help prevent AIDS.Â
You’ll help prevent unwanted children, unwanted pregnancies.Â
You’ll actually do a better job, I think, of passing on the moral responsibility that is expressed in your question. And I truly respect it.
« OK, I’m done
I just want to take a moment to say: WOOOOOHOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Comment by Tim — 10/28/2004 @ 10:02 pm