8/31/2004

Because “less features” is better

Filed under: @ 12:46 pm

Pardon my smirking, but I’m having a hard time keeping a straight face after reading this ComputerWorld article that claims the fact that Longhorn has been demoted to - in the words of some Microsoft cheerleader “analyst” - “just … the next Windows release” is going to be “some users’ gain”.

Color me cynical, but what makes me doubt that Apple would ever get this sort of treatment if they dropped every single significant feature in an announced major OS increment? Hell, they became a laughing stock when they choked on Copeland after the abortive Pink attempt. They continued to be the butt of the computer industry’s jokes only until they showed that they could build upon NeXT’s work in making a solid, user-friendly *NIX OS.

Leave a Reply

Recent Comments
  • Jim: Well, you know my opinion of it. Haven't gotten around to 83-96 yet myself. I'd love to have a better sounding copy of...
  • Brian: Hey Chris! It's no fiddlehead, but yeah - it looks like it would give lettuce a good run for its money.
  • Chris: But is it better than lettuce?
  • Brian: Yeah, I still need to make the first BMW purchase - they're sweet cars, but I just don't know when it's going to...
  • Jim: Nice! There was a time, so many many moons ago, that I would have sworn you'd never own anything but a BMW. Volkswagen...

Curious since 1974. Chronicling it here since 2004.

spacer