8/31/2004

mo·nop·o·ly

Filed under: @ 2:18 pm

According to Reference.com, it can be defined as:

“exclusive control of a particular market that is marked by the power to control prices and exclude competition and that especially is developed willfully rather than as the result of superior products or skill”.

Accurate. Succinct. Understandable. All-in-all, a good definition. Its only failing is citing Ticketmaster as an example, where a $75 concert ticket comes out at the end as $95.30. “Convenience fee”. Right.

At least I consider them to be completely worth it.

Because “less features” is better

Filed under: @ 12:46 pm

Pardon my smirking, but I’m having a hard time keeping a straight face after reading this ComputerWorld article that claims the fact that Longhorn has been demoted to - in the words of some Microsoft cheerleader “analyst” - “just … the next Windows release” is going to be “some users’ gain”.

Color me cynical, but what makes me doubt that Apple would ever get this sort of treatment if they dropped every single significant feature in an announced major OS increment? Hell, they became a laughing stock when they choked on Copeland after the abortive Pink attempt. They continued to be the butt of the computer industry’s jokes only until they showed that they could build upon NeXT’s work in making a solid, user-friendly *NIX OS.

If Roger Waters was dead…

Filed under: @ 11:10 am

…we could have an unlimited source of energy by rigging an electrical generator to his coffin because his corpse would be spinning in perpetuity:

Scissor Sisters version of “Comfortably Numb”.

The best way I can think of describing it (apologies to a KFOG listener who phoned in his similar impression) - a cover done by Erasure during their ABBA-infatuated years. To say that I think whoever is responsible for allowing this should be severely beaten would be a modest understatement.

8/30/2004

The Fix and other miscellany

Filed under: @ 9:55 am

So this morning’s “The Fix” from Salon has a pleathora of various tidbits:

  • While James Doohan (a.k.a. Star Trek’s Scotty) is finally receiving his star on the Walk of Fame, it will be his final public appearance as the poor man has announced that he has Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and diabetes.
  • Laura Brannigan (you know, the 80’s hit “Gloria”?) died of a brain aneurysm.
  • And Laura Bush doesn’t think the whole Swift Boat Veterans for “Truth” ad issue is unfair (she apparently thinks that there are “millions” of unfair ads against her husband). Oh yeah, and check out this quote on what she thinks about the suggestion that maybe her husband should have politely excused himself from reading “My Pet Goat” after the second plane hit the World Trade Center:

    “I think that’s a ridiculous allegation by John Kerry — it’s absurd. And I think what my husband did was perfectly appropriate. I think it was the right thing to do in front of the children. I think it was the right thing to do in front of the press that were there. And while he was there for those seven short minutes, his staff was getting more information.”

Oh, and what might be of particular interest to Sean: Bea Arthur, Sean’s Golden-Girl-sake, runs amok at Logan. He should be proud.

8/22/2004

So very, very wrong

Filed under: @ 2:01 pm

Courtesy of Boing Boing:

Pimp and Ho costumes for kids.

There’s something very, very wrong with some decision-makers in the costumemaking industry…

8/19/2004

46,644 Years

Filed under: @ 4:13 pm

A disturbing story, courtesy of Scot:

The Star Tribune out of Minnesota was uncomfortable with the contents of an advertisement an art gallery tried to place with them and as such refused to accept it. The content? Oh, death-toll statistics from the Iraq mess - broken down into certain minutae, like years never to be lived, number of teeth, tons of flesh & bone. The newspaper claimed it didn’t adhere to their “Standards of Good Taste”, yet refused to publish such standards.

No lies, no profanity, just statistics.

8/17/2004

Suck.com

Filed under: @ 6:53 pm

So as I sit here at Fertile Grounds, not doing what I’m supposed to be doing (well, doing my original intent of coming here, that is), I was just waxing nostalgic for Suck.com. What a great name (sure, it risked getting blocked by asinine firewalls like the one my current employer uses), great topics, great writing. *Sigh*. I remember first being turned on to it probably in 1997 when my then-employer (Be) got a mention and a company-wide email went out. I’ve since tried searching for that original mention on Suck (thank whomever is responsible for keeping the site up), but came up short. It’s really too bad Suck imploded. At least you can still read the archives though…

8/3/2004

Are you kidding me right now?

Filed under: @ 6:53 pm

I’m still uncertain what to make of this. That seems to be so outside the realm of what a telecom company should do. And yet, it’s nice to see a show of a sense of humor (although it comes at your expense - in the literal sense - in the end).

8/2/2004

Apple & Moto, Redux

Filed under: @ 6:05 pm

So DrunkenBlog has an interesting treatise on the new Apple-Motorola partnership (which I briefly rambled about earlier) with the added twist of the Real Networks “Harmony” issue. To be frank, the author makes a very persuasive argument and I wouldn’t be surprise if a lot of what they’re hypothesizing turns out. But without knowing what kind of broadband penetration (be it cable, DSL or satellite) we have currently (or what the projections are), I’m still hesitant about putting my money down on anything that requires a broadband connection to work effectively, or at all. While I do not doubt that even with the US economy being what it’s been for the last 4 years broadband has grown, it’s still a relatively expensive luxury.

Of course, one can make the argument that Apple has the audience who can afford it (and/or already has it) when pitching this sort of idea to the television & movie industries. But what kind of buy-in numbers are we talking about here, for a successful launch of an iMovie Store / Apple wifi PVR / whatever to happen? One presumes maybe something less than the iTunes Store launch. Well, they’ll definitely get less - a lot less. A TV/movie version of the iTunes Store would absolutely require broadband (as opposed to the iTunes Store, which can work via dial-up). DrunkenBlog has made a very compelling argument for an iMovie Store - such a thing will happen, but I still think it’s a bit further down the road. My coworker’s theory of a wifi PVR solution goes against Tivo (and to a much lesser extent, my former employer, ReplayTV) as well as the only Mac PVR that I’m aware of, Elgato Systems (but admittedly, they’re much less of a concern - see the whole Konfabulator/Dashboard and Watson/Sherlock scenarios). We might see something there, but I’m guessing it’s less likely to occur.

Recent Comments
  • Jim: Well, you know my opinion of it. Haven't gotten around to 83-96 yet myself. I'd love to have a better sounding copy of...
  • Brian: Hey Chris! It's no fiddlehead, but yeah - it looks like it would give lettuce a good run for its money.
  • Chris: But is it better than lettuce?
  • Brian: Yeah, I still need to make the first BMW purchase - they're sweet cars, but I just don't know when it's going to...
  • Jim: Nice! There was a time, so many many moons ago, that I would have sworn you'd never own anything but a BMW. Volkswagen...

Curious since 1974. Chronicling it here since 2004.

spacer